Entities mentioned:
- International Olympic Committee (IOC): Fairness, Competitive spirit, Professional pride
- Kirsty Coventry: Righteousness, Determination, Duty
- Dr. Jane Thornton: Professional pride, Duty, Influence
- Imane Khelif: Self-preservation, Competitive spirit, Recognition
- Lin Yu-Ting: Competitive spirit, Recognition, Self-preservation
- World Boxing: Fairness, Professional pride, Control

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 55/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 40/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 35/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents multiple viewpoints and cites scientific research, maintaining a relatively neutral stance. However, there's slightly more emphasis on the perspective supporting the ban, tilting it just right of center.

Key metric: Olympic Gender Equality Index

Let me tell you something - this is a GAME-CHANGING PLAY by the IOC! They're stepping up to the plate and making a fourth-quarter move that could redefine the playing field of women's sports. The IOC is showing a real championship mentality here, folks. They're not just calling the shots from the sidelines - they're getting in the trenches and tackling this issue head-on. This isn't just about individual athletes anymore; we're talking about reshaping the entire league! The scientific scoreboard is lighting up, and it's clear that biology is the MVP in this matchup. Mark my words, this decision is going to send shockwaves through the Olympic village and beyond. It's crunch time for transgender athletes, and the IOC is blowing the whistle on what they see as an unfair advantage. This is the kind of high-stakes decision that separates the contenders from the pretenders in the world of sports governance!