Entities mentioned:
- Imane Khelif: Justice, Self-respect, Competitive spirit
- World Boxing: Control, Professional pride, Security
- Court of Arbitration for Sport: Justice, Duty, Impartiality
- International Boxing Association: Control, Power, Influence
- International Olympic Committee: Influence, Professional pride, Control
- Kirsty Coventry: Duty, Justice, Professional pride

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 45/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 35/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 40/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents a balanced view of the situation, including perspectives from multiple stakeholders. It provides context for the controversy without overtly favoring any particular side, maintaining a neutral tone in reporting the facts.

Key metric: Gender Equality in Sports

As a social scientist, I analyze that this article highlights a significant tension between athletic fairness, individual rights, and gender identity in international sports. The case of Imane Khelif exemplifies the complex challenges facing sports governing bodies in establishing and implementing sex eligibility rules. This controversy impacts gender equality in sports by potentially excluding athletes based on genetic testing, which could disproportionately affect women and intersex individuals. The shifting landscape of boxing governance, from IBA to World Boxing, demonstrates the political nature of these decisions and the pressure organizations face to create standardized policies. The involvement of the IOC and CAS underscores the global significance of this issue, extending beyond boxing to impact Olympic sports broadly. This case may set a precedent for how gender eligibility is determined in high-level sports competitions, potentially influencing policies across various athletic disciplines.