Entities mentioned:
- Major League Baseball: Innovation, Control, Professional pride
- MLB Competition Committee: Duty, Influence, Professional pride
- Rob Manfred: Leadership, Innovation, Legacy
- MLB Players: Competitive spirit, Fairness, Professional pride
- Umpires: Professional pride, Accuracy, Job security

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 85/100
Bias Rating: 50/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 65/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 30/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents a balanced view of the new system, including perspectives from various stakeholders. It provides factual information and statistics without favoring any particular side of the debate.

Key metric: Accuracy of Ball/Strike Calls

Let me tell you something - this is a GAME-CHANGER, folks! Major League Baseball is stepping up to the plate with a revolutionary move that's going to shake up America's favorite pastime. The introduction of robot umpires is like bringing in a star closer in the 9th inning - it's all about precision and getting the job done right. But make no mistake, this isn't a complete substitution. It's more like adding a designated hitter to the lineup - human umps are still in the game, but now they've got some high-tech backup. This challenge system? It's like instant replay on steroids, giving teams a chance to contest those crucial calls that can make or break a game. We're talking about a whole new level of strategy here, folks. Managers will need to be as sharp as a cleanup hitter eyeing a fastball, deciding when to pull the trigger on those challenges. And let's not forget about the catchers - their framing skills are still in play, like a defensive specialist who can turn the tide of a game without ever swinging a bat. This is the kind of forward-thinking that keeps baseball ahead in the sports world's pennant race!

Entities mentioned:
- Donald Trump: Power, Ambition, Competitive spirit
- Kamala Harris: Ambition, Legacy, Duty
- Joe Biden: Legacy, Duty, Influence
- Hillary Clinton: Ambition, Legacy, Influence
- CNN: Professional pride, Influence, Recognition
- Edison Research: Professional pride, Accuracy, Recognition
- National Election Pool: Accuracy, Influence, Professional pride

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 45/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 50/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 20/100 (Strongly Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents data from multiple elections and diverse demographic groups, showing effort for balanced reporting. While it includes both positive and negative aspects for each candidate, there's a slight lean towards emphasizing Trump's gains.

Key metric: Voter Demographics and Preferences

As a social scientist, I analyze that this article presents a comprehensive overview of shifting voter demographics and preferences across three presidential elections involving Donald Trump. The data reveals significant changes in various voter groups, including women, Latinos, and educational demographics. The economy emerges as a crucial factor, with a majority of voters perceiving it negatively in 2024, benefiting Trump. The article also highlights the evolving abortion debate and its impact on voting patterns. The shift in first-time voter support from Democrats to Republicans is notable, as is the increased polarization among liberals and conservatives. These trends suggest a complex political landscape with multiple factors influencing voter behavior, including economic conditions, social issues, and candidate appeal.

Entities mentioned:
- Donald Trump: Power, Control, Influence
- Department of Commerce: Duty, Obligation, Professional pride
- Jeffrey Wice: Professional pride, Duty, Curiosity
- Census Bureau: Duty, Professional pride, Accuracy
- Marjorie Taylor Greene: Ambition, Influence, Loyalty
- Ron DeSantis: Ambition, Competitive spirit, Power
- Howard Lutnick: Duty, Obligation, Professional pride
- Gina Raimondo: Duty, Professional pride, Loyalty
- Erika McEntarfer: Professional pride, Duty, Integrity

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 70/100
Bias Rating: 55/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 35/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 65/100 (Authoritarian Tendencies)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents multiple viewpoints, including Trump's proposal and critiques from experts. However, it gives more space to arguments against the proposal, suggesting a slight center-left lean.

Key metric: Electoral Representation

As a social scientist, I analyze that this proposal to exclude undocumented immigrants from the census could significantly impact electoral representation and the distribution of federal resources. This move would likely shift political power towards areas with fewer immigrants, potentially benefiting Republican-leaning states. The proposal challenges longstanding constitutional interpretations and could face legal hurdles. It also raises concerns about the politicization of traditionally non-partisan government functions like the census, which could undermine public trust in these institutions. The timing and feasibility of conducting a new census before 2030 are questionable, given the extensive planning and resources required for such an undertaking.