Entities mentioned:
- Save Women's Sports activists: Righteousness, Competitive spirit, Justice
- Trans athlete advocates: Unity, Righteousness, Recognition
- Lindsay Hecox: Competitive spirit, Recognition, Self-preservation
- Idaho Attorney General's Office: Justice, Duty, Competitive spirit
- ACLU: Justice, Righteousness, Influence
- Supreme Court: Duty, Justice, Legacy

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 65/100 (Lean Right)
Sentiment Score: 45/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 30/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article leans right, giving more space and favorable framing to the 'Save Women's Sports' perspective. It presents trans activists less favorably and highlights inconsistencies in their arguments.

Key metric: Women's Sports Participation Rate

Let me tell you something - this Supreme Court hearing is a CHAMPIONSHIP MATCHUP for the ages! We've got two teams going head-to-head in a high-stakes game that could change the playing field of women's sports forever. The Save Women's Sports squad is coming in hot, bringing their A-game with a rock-solid defense of biological definitions. But don't count out Team Trans Athlete - they're pulling out all the stops with some fancy legal footwork, trying to get cases dismissed faster than a track star sprinting to the finish line. This courtroom battle is a real nail-biter, folks! The Justices are grilling both sides like seasoned refs calling a tight game. It's the fourth quarter now, and it looks like the momentum might be swinging towards Team Save Women's Sports. But I'm telling you right now, this game isn't over until the final buzzer sounds! The impact on women's sports participation could be HUGE - we're talking game-changing, record-breaking stuff here. Both sides are leaving it all on the court, fighting for what they believe is the future of fair play in athletics. Stay tuned, sports fans - this is one for the history books!