Entities mentioned:
- John Isner: Righteousness, Professional pride, Indignation
- Tennys Sandgren: Righteousness, Professional pride, Indignation
- Amanda Anisimova: Self-preservation, Professional pride, Determination
- Coco Gauff: Righteousness, Unity, Influence
- Reporter: Curiosity, Ambition, Recognition

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 55/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 40/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 20/100 (Strongly Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents multiple viewpoints, including those critical of the reporter and Gauff's contrasting approach. While it leans slightly towards the athletes' perspective, it maintains a relatively balanced presentation of the incident.

Key metric: Media Integrity in Sports Journalism

Let me tell you something - this story is RIDICULOUS! We've got a real battle brewing on the media sidelines of the Australian Open, folks! Ex-American tennis stars John Isner and Tennys Sandgren are stepping up to the plate, defending their teammate Amanda Anisimova from what they see as an out-of-bounds play by a rogue reporter. This journalist tried to lob a political curveball at Anisimova, but she showed true championship mentality, swatting it away with a powerful 'not relevant' return! It's like watching a doubles match where Isner and Sandgren are backing up Anisimova, creating a united front against unnecessary political pressure in the sport. Meanwhile, Coco Gauff's taking a different approach, engaging in a rally on social issues - showcasing the diverse strategies these athletes employ when facing off-court challenges. This, folks, is a prime example of how the game extends beyond the baseline, with players navigating the tricky terrain of sports and society. It's fourth quarter stuff, and these athletes are showing us their clutch performance isn't limited to the tennis court!